Skip to content
Likelier
Lifestyle

Spending on travel vs saving the money

Last reviewed 2026-04-25

Evidence quality 3.88/5

Eight-dimension review score against the quality rubric . Each dimension scored 1–5.

D1 Source verification
4/5
D2 Source authority & independence
3/5
D3 Regret-rate accuracy
3/5
D4 Source comparability
2/5
D5 Gilovich pattern
5/5
D6 Prose quality
5/5
D7 Caveat completeness
5/5
D8 Sample quality
4/5
Average 3.88/5
Two identical suitcases side by side, one open and covered with destination stickers, the other closed and dusty.

Action regret

Spending on travel

6.0%

6% regret spending on travel

UK adults, online panel

retrospective, no fixed timeframe

Inaction regret

Saving the money instead of traveling

71%

71% regret missed travel opportunities

Global travelers, 32 countries

retrospective, no fixed timeframe

% who regret this choice

inaction dominates — Inaction dominates — most regret not acting.

Related decisions

Semantically similar decisions — same territory, different trade-offs.

lifestyle

Move abroad

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 5.7× higher

Financial

Investing

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 2.9× higher

lifestyle

EV vs gas car

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 2.9× higher

lifestyle

Gap year vs. straight to university

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 3.8× higher

lifestyle

Economic migration vs. staying home

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 1.4× higher

lifestyle

Embracing change

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 3.3× higher

lifestyle

Hiring cleaning help

% who regret this choice

Inaction dominates

Inaction regret 5.6× higher

Financial

Home renovation

% who regret this choice

Action dominates

Action regret 2.3× higher

71% of travelers worldwide report regretting missed travel opportunities, per Booking.com’s survey of 20,500 people across 32 countries. On the action side, only 6% of adults regret the money they spent on travel, according to a Claris Finance survey of 2,000 UK adults — one of the lowest action-regret rates for any major spending category. The resulting 12:1 ratio makes this the strongest regret asymmetry in the dataset, and one of the cleanest confirmations of Gilovich and Medvec’s inaction-dominance finding.

The psychological mechanism is well-documented. Van Boven and Gilovich (2003) showed that experiential purchases generate more lasting satisfaction than material ones, partly because experiences become part of identity and are psychologically protected from regret. Travel is the canonical experiential purchase. Even trips that went badly tend to become good stories; money saved by not traveling generates no narrative at all. Among adults over 70, Explore Worldwide found that 62% regretted missing at least one dream destination — confirming that this regret does not fade with age but, if anything, intensifies.

The main caveat is sample bias. Booking.com’s respondents are people interested enough in travel to be on a travel platform, inflating the inaction-regret rate. The true population rate for travel regret among all adults — including those with no interest in travel — is certainly lower than 71%. Similarly, the 6% action-regret figure may be deflated by the “rosy retrospection” effect, where people systematically remember experiences more positively than they were. The directional finding (travel regret overwhelmingly favors action) is robust; the magnitude should be read as an upper bound.

Sources: action

Claim ledger

Every number below is what each source reported, with the verbatim quote we relied on and how we arrived at our figure. Click any link to verify directly.

  1. [1] International Traveller / Claris Finance survey — Top 10 Biggest Travel Regrets Revealed
    Top 10 Biggest Travel Regrets Revealed
    Statistic
    Only 6% of respondents regretted the money they spent traveling; close to 20% traveled a lot and had no regrets
    Excerpt
    “"Only 6% regretted the money they spent traveling, while close to 20% said they traveled 'a lot' and had no regrets whatsoever. Respondents aged 41-50 and those 61+ were disproportionately more likely to regret NOT spending money on travel." ”
    Source data from
    2019-09-15
    Accessed
    2026-04-25
    Calculation
    Claris Finance survey of 2,000 UK adults. The 6% figure represents those who specifically regretted the financial outlay on travel. This is one of the lowest action-regret rates in any spending category.
  2. [2] Bankrate — Travel Vs. Savings: Many Americans Are Prioritizing Wanderlust Amid Economic Uncertainty
    Travel Vs. Savings: Many Americans Are Prioritizing Wanderlust Amid Economic Uncertainty
    Statistic
    Americans increasingly prioritize travel spending even amid economic uncertainty; regret about travel expenditure is rare
    Excerpt
    “"Many Americans are prioritizing travel even amid economic uncertainty. Survey data consistently shows that experiential spending — particularly travel — generates less regret than material purchases." ”
    Source data from
    2023-08-14
    Accessed
    2026-04-25
    Calculation
    Bankrate contextual reporting. Corroborates that travel spending regret is unusually low compared to other discretionary categories.

Sources: inaction

Claim ledger

Every number below is what each source reported, with the verbatim quote we relied on and how we arrived at our figure. Click any link to verify directly.

  1. [1] Booking.com — Younger generations are most regretful about missed travel opportunities
    Younger generations are most regretful about missed travel opportunities
    Statistic
    71% of global travelers regret having missed opportunities to travel in their lives
    Excerpt
    “"A study by Booking.com has revealed that up to 71% of travellers around the world regret having missed opportunities to travel in their lives. The most common regrets: not traveling more often (46%), not traveling more when younger (35%), not visiting more of the countries traveled to (29%)." ”
    Source data from
    2022-11-02
    Accessed
    2026-04-25
    Calculation
    Booking.com surveyed 20,500 people across 32 countries. The 71% includes all forms of travel-opportunity regret, not just financial trade-offs. We use it as the inaction-regret rate because the core sentiment is "I should have traveled more."
  2. [2] NZ Herald / Explore Worldwide — Biggest travel regrets of people over 70 revealed in survey
    Biggest travel regrets of people over 70 revealed in survey
    Statistic
    62% of people over 70 regretted missing out on visiting at least one dream destination
    Excerpt
    “"62 per cent of people over the age of 70 regretted missing out on visiting at least one dream destination. Travel regret persists and even intensifies in old age." ”
    Source data from
    2023-03-15
    Accessed
    2026-04-25
    Calculation
    Explore Worldwide survey of adults over 70. The 62% among elderly respondents confirms that travel inaction regret does not fade with time — consistent with Gilovich's temporal pattern.

Caveats

INDUSTRY-FUNDING BIAS: Both primary sources have financial interests in promoting travel. Booking.com is a travel booking platform; its 71% inaction-regret figure comes from surveying travelers on its own platform, a population pre-selected for travel interest. Claris Finance is a UK financial services company; its 6% action-regret figure comes from a survey likely designed to frame travel spending as low-regret. No independent academic study was found that measures both travel-spending regret and travel-forgoing regret in the same population. The action and inaction figures come from different surveys with different populations (UK adults vs global travelers across 32 countries). The Claris Finance 6% is also likely deflated by experiential-purchase bias: people psychologically protect memories of experiences more than material goods (Van Boven & Gilovich, 2003). The Bankrate contextual source does not provide a specific regret percentage. The 12:1 ratio is the most extreme in the dataset and should be interpreted as directionally suggestive rather than precisely calibrated — the true ratio is almost certainly smaller once industry-selection bias is accounted for.

Raw data: /api/decisions.json