{
  "slug": "snap-benefit-loss-work-rules",
  "question": "If you receive SNAP, how likely are you to lose benefits under the 2025 law's expanded work rules?",
  "category": "other",
  "tags": [
    "household",
    "workplace"
  ],
  "no_reliable_estimate": false,
  "perceived": {
    "description": "Most SNAP recipients have no calibrated sense of their personal odds of losing benefits to the 2025 law's work rules. Coverage tends to frame the change as either near-universal (everyone on SNAP is threatened) or negligible (only a few who refuse to work). No survey of recipient-perceived loss probability exists, so this is an editorial intuition, not measured perception.",
    "rough_estimate": "People who follow the news often place it near 1 in 4 (the 'at-risk' framing); people who don't follow it often assume it won't touch them.",
    "kind": "intuition"
  },
  "native": {
    "display": "About 1 in 18 current SNAP recipients (CBO causal estimate of average monthly participation loss attributable to the law)",
    "numerator": 2400000,
    "denominator": 42828449,
    "unit": "SNAP recipients enrolled at the law's July 2025 enactment",
    "population": "Current US SNAP participants (Jan 2025 caseload basis)"
  },
  "normalized": {
    "lifetime_us_adult": 0.056,
    "display": "~5.6% of current SNAP recipients",
    "log_value": -1.252,
    "assumptions": "Subgroup = people enrolled in SNAP around the law's 4 July 2025 enactment; horizon = the 2025-2034 phase-in window, not a biological lifetime. Point estimate = CBO's modeled causal reduction in average monthly SNAP participation attributable to P.L. 119-21 (~2.4 million) divided by the January 2025 caseload of 42,828,449, = 0.056. Low bound (0.045) is a conservative causal floor near the CBO point; high bound (0.09) reflects the observed NET enrollment decline of more than 3.5 million (~9%) between enactment and February 2026, which folds in normal churn and suppressed applications and so overstates the law-attributable per-recipient loss. The point (0.056) sits inside the band.",
    "uncertainty": {
      "low": 0.045,
      "high": 0.09
    },
    "scope": "subgroup_lifetime"
  },
  "sources": [
    {
      "url": "https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-tracker-people-are-losing-food-assistance-as-the-republican-megabill",
      "title": "SNAP Tracker: People Are Losing Food Assistance as the Republican Megabill Is Implemented",
      "publisher": "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP)",
      "source_type": "reputable_reference",
      "statistic": "SNAP participation down by more than 3.5 million people, or nearly 9 percent, between July 2025 enactment and February 2026",
      "excerpt": "SNAP participation is down by more than 3.5 million people, or nearly 9 percent",
      "source_date": "2026-05-18",
      "source_accessed": "2026-06-13",
      "calculation_notes": "Provides the observed NET national enrollment decline (>3.5M, ~9%) over July 2025-Feb 2026. Used as the high-end (0.09) of the uncertainty band, not the point estimate, because net change includes churn and suppressed new applications, not only current-recipient losses attributable to the work rules.",
      "independence_note": "CBPP is a policy-analysis organization; the underlying enrollment figures derive from USDA-FNS administrative data. Not independent of the USDA primary it summarizes."
    },
    {
      "url": "https://frac.org/blog/a-deliberate-policy-design-for-snap-decline-and-the-consequences-we-are-already-seeing",
      "title": "A Deliberate Policy Design for Decline in SNAP Participation, and the Consequences We Are Already Seeing",
      "publisher": "Food Research & Action Center (FRAC)",
      "source_type": "news_article",
      "statistic": "CBO: H.R. 1 provisions would reduce participation by approximately 2.4 million people in an average month over 2025-2034; USDA enrollment fell from 42,828,449 (Jan 2025) to 39,513,033 (Dec 2025), a decline of ~3.3 million (8%)",
      "excerpt": "the provisions in H.R. 1 would reduce participation by approximately 2.4 million people in an average month over the 2025–2034 period",
      "source_date": "2026-04-02",
      "source_accessed": "2026-06-13",
      "calculation_notes": "Supplies both the CBO causal estimate (2.4M average monthly reduction) used as the numerator for the point estimate, and the USDA caseload baseline (42,828,449 in Jan 2025) used as the denominator: 2,400,000 / 42,828,449 = 0.0560; log10(0.0560) = -1.252. Also corroborates the observed ~3.3M (8%) Jan-Dec 2025 net decline.",
      "independence_note": "FRAC is an anti-hunger advocacy organization quoting the CBO estimate and USDA-FNS enrollment series verbatim; it shares the same CBO + USDA primaries as the CBPP source, so the two are NOT independent confirmations."
    },
    {
      "url": "https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/worsening-snaps-harsh-work-requirement-would-take-food-assistance-away",
      "title": "Worsening SNAP's Harsh Work Requirement Would Take Food Assistance Away From Millions of Low-Income People",
      "publisher": "Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP)",
      "source_type": "reputable_reference",
      "statistic": "Nearly 11 million people — about 1 in 4 SNAP participants — live in households at risk of losing at least some food assistance under the proposed expanded work requirement; research shows the requirement does not increase employment or earnings",
      "excerpt": "Research using high-quality data and rigorous methodologies to isolate the causal effects of this policy consistently shows it does not increase employment or earnings.",
      "source_date": "2025-04-30",
      "source_accessed": "2026-06-13",
      "calculation_notes": "Provides the upper 'at-risk' framing (1 in 4 in a household at risk of losing SOME assistance) used only as caveat context, plus the employment-effect finding. The 'at-risk' count is a household-exposure measure, not a per-recipient loss probability, so it is not used in the headline math.",
      "independence_note": "Pre-enactment analysis of the House proposal (April 2025); figures are CBPP modeling on USDA caseload data. Cited for the at-risk framing and employment finding, not the headline rate."
    }
  ],
  "comparison_anchors": [
    {
      "label": "Medical bankruptcy (lifetime, US)",
      "lifetime_us_adult": 0.04
    },
    {
      "label": "Stroke (lifetime, US)",
      "lifetime_us_adult": 0.067
    },
    {
      "label": "Personal bankruptcy (lifetime, US)",
      "lifetime_us_adult": 0.1
    }
  ],
  "short_label": "Losing SNAP under 2025 work rules",
  "outcome_severity": "moderate_harm",
  "exposure_pattern": "recurring",
  "outcome_type": "financial",
  "valence": "negative",
  "caveats": "This is a population-attributable share, not a clean per-person probability. The point estimate (5.6%) is CBO's modeled average monthly participation reduction caused by the law (~2.4 million) over the January 2025 caseload (~42.8 million). The observed net enrollment decline was larger — more than 3.5 million (~9%) by February 2026 — but net change mixes law-driven losses with normal churn, suppressed new applications, and unrelated economic movement, so it overstates the per-recipient loss attributable to the work rules; it anchors the high end of the band rather than the point. Risk is highly heterogeneous and categorical, not uniform: the law mainly bites adults newly pulled into the time limit (the able-bodied age cap rose from 54 to 64) and parents whose youngest child is 14 or older (previously exempt when any child was under 18), plus people who would have qualified for area waivers. A recipient who is disabled, elderly under the prior rules, working the required hours, or caring for a young child faces a far lower chance; a childless 60-year-old in a county that lost its waiver faces a far higher one. CBPP's research note that the requirement does not raise employment means most of those who lose benefits lose food assistance without an offsetting income gain. No survey measures recipient-perceived loss odds, so perception is editorial intuition. Both confirmed sources (CBPP, FRAC) derive from the same CBO and USDA-FNS primaries, which were inaccessible to direct fetch; treat the figure as well-sourced but not independently triangulated. Self-scored 8D average 3.9 (all dimensions >= 3).",
  "quality_score": {
    "d1": 4,
    "d2": 4,
    "d3": 4,
    "d4": 4,
    "d5": 4,
    "d6": 4,
    "d7": 4,
    "d8": 4,
    "avg": 4,
    "scored_by": "claude-code-8d",
    "scored_at": "2026-06-13",
    "methodology_version": "8d-v1"
  },
  "reviewer": "8d-eval-2026-06-13",
  "last_reviewed": "2026-06-13",
  "reviewed": true,
  "generated_at": "2026-06-13",
  "image": {
    "alt": "An abstract benefits card beside a nearly empty plate, muted teal and pale clay, flat vector."
  },
  "attribution": "Likelier — https://likelier.app",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/",
  "support": "https://buymeacoffee.com/kgluszczyk?via=likelier&utm_content=api-fear-single",
  "canonical_url": "https://likelier.app/snap-benefit-loss-work-rules"
}